England women vs india women ended with India beating England by 270 runs in the one-off Test at Lord’s, London, from 10 to 13 July 2026. England’s 170 after India’s 285 created a 115-run deficit.

In front of 37,846 spectators across four days, India answered with 341/7 declared, powered by Yastika Bhatia’s 113. Kranti Gaud’s 5/37 and Sneh Rana’s 4/42 then dismissed England for 186. The winning formula was clear: sustained batting pressure followed by wickets with the new ball and spin.

england women vs india women scorecard and match overview

The match was the first-ever Women’s Test staged at Lord’s. England won the toss and chose to field, but India’s batting unit produced enough runs in both innings to control the match from the opening session. The official scorecard lists India’s totals as 285 and 341/7 declared, while England made 170 and 186. India won by 270 runs. 1

The attendance figure represented a world record for a Women’s Test, according to the match scorecard. UK viewers had live coverage through Sky Sports, while BBC Four and BBC iPlayer carried daily highlights. In India, coverage was available through Sony Sports Network, DD Sports and SonyLIV. 4 5

Core Match Statistics Overview

This was a four-innings Test in which India created separation in every major category. The visitors scored 626 combined runs, compared with England’s 356, and took all 20 England wickets. England dismissed 17 Indian batters because India declared at 341/7.

The boundary totals below are calculated by adding the fours and sixes recorded in each innings of the official scorecard.

england women vs india women result: the first-innings gap

• India’s 285 was 115 runs higher than England’s 170, giving the visitors control before the second innings began.
• India scored at 3.80 runs per over in the first innings, compared with England’s 2.87.

Boundary production and scoring rate

• India struck 79 fours and two sixes across the match, producing 328 boundary runs from the listed batting figures.
• England managed 37 fours and one six, or 154 boundary runs, leaving them with less scoring pressure when partnerships ended.

Middle-order conversion

• India recorded six scores of 50 or more across the match, including three in each innings.
• England had only three individual 50-plus scores, and two of those came from Amy Jones.

Bowling wicket distribution

• Kranti Gaud took seven wickets in the match, while Sneh Rana claimed six and Sayali Satghare four.
• Sophie Ecclestone led England’s attack with eight wickets, but India’s declaration meant England did not need to take three further wickets.

Period-by-Period Analysis: Four Test Innings

First innings: India Women 285 all out

• India lost Shafali Verma for four and Yastika Bhatia for 12, but Smriti Mandhana’s 83 prevented the early wickets from becoming a larger collapse.
• Harmanpreet Kaur added 58 from 121 balls and Deepti Sharma made 57 from 87, giving India three substantial contributions rather than one isolated score.
• Ecclestone took three wickets, while Lauren Filer, Issy Wong and Mady Villiers took two each, but India still reached 285.

India’s first innings was built around patience followed by controlled acceleration. Mandhana’s 83 contained 11 fours and a six, while Kaur and Deepti extended the innings through long defensive periods. India did not need to dominate every over; they needed to make England bowl for long enough to create a competitive total.

The scorecard’s fall-of-wicket sequence shows the importance of the middle order. India were 101/3 when Jemimah Rodrigues fell, but Mandhana continued until 190. Kaur and Deepti then carried the total beyond 200, ensuring England had no short chase after the change of innings.

Second innings: England Women 170 all out

• England fell to 47/4 after early wickets removed Tammy Beaumont, Maia Bouchier, Heather Knight and Alice Capsey.
• Amy Jones and Nat Sciver-Brunt added resistance, but Jones was dismissed for 52 and Sciver-Brunt for 44 before England reached a competitive position.
• Gaud finished with 5/37, supported by two wickets each from Satghare and Rana and one from Deepti Sharma.

The most damaging phase came before lunch on the second day. Gaud’s line and length repeatedly forced England’s batters to play around the ball, while Satghare removed Heather Knight and Sophie Ecclestone. England’s top four were gone by 47, leaving Jones and Sciver-Brunt to repair the innings.

Their partnership moved England from 47/4 to 131/5, but India attacked again before the deficit could be reduced. Jones’ 52 was England’s highest score in the innings, yet the hosts were bowled out for 170 and trailed by 115.

Third innings: India Women 341/7 declared

• India reached 154/1 at the end of Day 2, with Mandhana unbeaten on 69 and Bhatia on 39.
• Bhatia converted her start into 113, the first triple-digit score in a Women’s Test at Lord’s, while Mandhana added another 70.
• Richa Ghosh’s 50 from 52 balls gave India the late scoring surge needed to declare at 341/7 and set England 457.

Bhatia’s innings changed the match equation. She faced 158 balls, struck 14 fours and stayed at the crease long enough to make England’s fourth-innings task unrealistic. Her century also placed her name among the first women to record a major batting landmark at Lord’s.

India’s lead was already 115 after the first innings. The second-innings declaration added 341 more runs, meaning England needed 457 to win. Richa’s unbeaten fifty arrived at a faster rate than most of the innings, allowing Harmanpreet Kaur’s side to declare rather than continue batting for individual milestones.

Fourth innings: England Women 186 all out

• England were 23/3 and then 34/4, with India’s seamers and spinners preventing a stable opening partnership.
• Jones made 54 and Ecclestone 50, but their scores arrived inside an innings that lost wickets at regular intervals.
• Rana took the final wicket at 186, completing a four-wicket haul and sealing India’s 270-run victory.

England began the fourth innings under immediate pressure. Beaumont was dismissed for a first-ball duck, Bouchier fell for two and Nat Sciver-Brunt made only 11. Jones again resisted, but the required target was too large for a defensive approach to produce a realistic chase.

Ecclestone’s 50 was an important personal achievement, yet it also showed the depth of England’s problem. Their lower order spent many balls at the crease without adding enough runs, and India kept attacking the stumps. Deepti Sharma took two wickets, while Satghare and Gaud took two each.

India Women Player Statistics

The India Women player statistics show a clear combination of top-order accumulation, middle-order endurance and wicket-taking variety. The complete batting and bowling figures are taken from the match scorecard. 1

Smriti Mandhana’s two substantial innings

Mandhana was India’s highest aggregate run-scorer with 153 runs. Her first-innings 83 established the batting platform, while her second-innings 70 helped India move from a lead into a winning position.

She combined scoring shots with long periods of risk management. The two innings were different in tempo, but both prevented England from taking control with the new ball.

Yastika Bhatia’s 113 at Lord’s

Bhatia’s 113 off 158 balls was the highest individual innings of the match. Her 14 fours helped India build a lead that was too large for England to recover from.

Her first-innings score of 12 was modest, but the second-innings century showed how effectively she adjusted after seeing the surface and England’s bowling plans. The innings also earned her a place on the Lord’s batting honours board.

Kranti Gaud’s five-wicket haul

Gaud was named Player of the Match after figures of 5/37 and 2/54. Her first-innings five-for removed England’s middle order and created the 115-run advantage that shaped the remainder of the Test.

Her seven wickets were spread across both innings, meaning England never found a safe phase against her. Gaud also became the first bowler to take a five-wicket haul in a Women’s Test at Lord’s. 3

Sneh Rana’s control on the final day

Rana’s figures of 2/41 and 4/42 gave India six wickets in the match. Her four-wicket second innings included the dismissal of Amy Jones and the final wicket of Sophie Ecclestone.

Rana’s ability to attack the stumps while keeping the scoring rate low stopped England from turning resistance into a partnership-led recovery.

Harmanpreet Kaur also contributed 74 runs across the two innings, while Deepti Sharma scored 67 and took three wickets. Richa Ghosh added 63 runs in total, including an unbeaten 50 that helped India declare at the right time.

England Women Player Statistics

England’s leading individual performances came from Amy Jones and Sophie Ecclestone, but both were separated from the rest of the batting card by a wide margin. The scorecard records the following leading contributions. 1

Amy Jones carried England’s batting

Jones was England’s highest aggregate scorer with 106 runs. Her 52 in the first innings came when England were in trouble at 47/4, and her second-innings 54 again provided the main resistance.

As wicketkeeper, Jones also remained involved behind the stumps during India’s long innings. Her repeated scores showed application, but England needed more support around her.

Sophie Ecclestone produced a late resistance

Ecclestone finished with eight wickets, including 5/118 in India’s second innings, and scored a defiant 50 in England’s final innings. Her bowling was the strongest part of England’s attack, particularly when she removed Deepti Sharma, Sayali Satghare and Yastika Bhatia.

Her batting effort delayed the result, but the target of 457 required England to score much faster while preserving wickets. India’s spinners eventually broke through her defence.

Nat Sciver-Brunt could not repeat her first-innings start

Sciver-Brunt made 44 in the first innings, including a six, but fell for 11 in the second. Her first effort helped England recover from 47/4, yet her dismissal at 142/6 left the tail exposed.

The captain’s second-innings wicket arrived during India’s strongest period of control, leaving Jones and Villiers to rebuild again.

Mady Villiers made an impact on debut

Villiers scored 10 and 26 and took two wickets in India’s first innings. Her maiden Test wicket removed Harmanpreet Kaur, while her second accounted for Sneh Rana.

She showed enough promise with the ball to trouble India’s middle order, but England’s batting collapse meant those contributions could not change the result.

Lauren Bell also took three wickets in the match, including 2/27 in India’s second innings.

Statistical Leaders Summary

Why India Women Won

India created a 115-run first-innings advantage

India did not need one overwhelming innings to take control. Mandhana, Kaur and Deepti all reached half-centuries, giving India a 285 total that was almost 68 percent higher than England’s first-innings score.

England’s 170 was not only a low total; it was built after losing four wickets for 47. That meant India’s bowlers were able to attack the lower order rather than defend against a settled top six.

Yastika Bhatia 113 changed the match equation

Bhatia’s century forced England to bowl through a long, technically demanding innings. Ecclestone took five wickets, but India’s middle order absorbed those spells and still produced 341/7.

The late unbeaten partnership involving Richa Ghosh and Sayali Satghare was also significant. Richa scored at 96.15, giving India enough momentum to declare instead of allowing England extra time to rest and prepare.

Kranti Gaud five-wicket haul led a balanced attack

India’s attack did not depend on one bowler. Gaud made the initial breakthrough, Satghare removed key batters in both innings, and Rana controlled the final phases with six wickets overall.

That distribution mattered because England could not simply wait for one bowler to finish a spell. Every change brought a different challenge, and India’s bowlers maintained pressure until the innings ended.

India set a target that demanded an extraordinary chase

The target of 457 was the direct result of India’s two complete plans: build a first-innings lead, then bat long enough in the third innings to remove any realistic route to victory for England.

England would have needed 287 more runs after reaching 170 in the first innings. Instead, India took 10 wickets for 186 and finished with the fourth-largest margin of victory by runs in Women’s Tests, according to the ICC. 3

Why England Women Lost

England’s top order collapsed in both innings

England were 47/4 in the first innings and 34/4 in the second. That pattern made it difficult to build the long partnerships needed in Test cricket.

Beaumont’s dismissals were especially costly: she made two in the first innings and a first-ball duck in the second. Knight also struggled to settle, while Sciver-Brunt could not reproduce her first-innings resistance during the chase.

England relied too heavily on two batters

More than half of England’s runs in each innings came from two players. That concentration left little margin for error when Jones, Sciver-Brunt or Ecclestone was dismissed.

India’s batting was not dependent on one pair to the same extent. India’s first innings contained three scores above 50, and the second innings featured Bhatia’s century, Mandhana’s 70 and Ghosh’s unbeaten 50.

The lower order could not sustain the chase

England’s lower order faced enough deliveries to make India work, but not enough runs came from those balls. The final innings run rate of 2.96 was higher than England’s first-innings rate, yet the side still lost wickets before the target became approachable.

The contrast with India’s lower order was visible in Richa Ghosh’s 50 off 52 balls. India’s wicketkeeper did not simply survive; she changed the scoring speed and helped her team declare at the right point.

England Women vs India Women Season Series Breakdown

The Lord’s Test followed a three-match T20I series in which England won 2-1. India won the opening T20I in Chelmsford, but England responded with victories in Bristol and Taunton. The Test therefore produced a different result from the preceding white-ball series. 6

Historic Dominance: India Women Clinch Lord’s Test After T20I Series Thriller

London, July 2026 – In a summer defined by the contrast of two formats, the India Women’s cricket team etched their names into the history books with a resounding 270-run victory over England in the first-ever Women’s Test match at Lord’s. While England edged a fiercely competitive T20I series, India’s discipline and collective brilliance in the longer format ultimately proved decisive at the Home of Cricket.

The Tale of Two Series

The multi-format tour began with a high-octane T20I series that showcased the explosive best of the England side.

The series opened in Chelmsford on May 28, with India drawing first blood, winning by 38 runs. However, England responded emphatically in Bristol, chasing down 142 with 26 runs to spare. The decider in Taunton was a masterclass in aggressive batting from the hosts. Despite India posting a competitive 180/5, England cruised to a six-wicket victory, securing the T20I series 2-1. Alice Capsey’s brilliant 82 and Heather Knight’s unbeaten 70 were instrumental in that triumph.

But the narrative shifted dramatically as the teams moved to Lord’s for the four-day Only Test. The longer format demanded patience and sustained concentration, qualities that India harnessed perfectly.

Advanced Statistical Insights: How India Won the Test

The statistical breakdown of the Test reveals a comprehensive Indian victory built on improved run rates, deeper batting contributions, and relentless bowling pressure.

1. Superior Scoring and Conversion

India did not just bat longer; they batted better. As conditions settled, India improved their scoring rate from 3.80 in the first innings to an aggressive 3.94 in the second. While England also improved their rate (from 2.87 to 2.96), the marginal 0.09 increase was insufficient to overcome the massive 115-run deficit from the first innings. India’s scoring advantage was nearly a run per over in both innings.

Test Match Scoring Rates:

2. India’s Depth vs. England’s Dependence

India’s victory was a team effort, reflected in the distribution of runs. In the first innings, India’s top two scorers contributed 49.5% of the total, whereas England’s top two relied on 56.5% of theirs.

This trend continued in the second innings. The partnership between Yastika Bhatia and Smriti Mandhana supplied 183 runs, but it was Richa Ghosh’s rapid 50 not out that propelled India’s top three to a staggering 233-run contribution. In stark contrast, England’s second-innings top three managed only 125 runs, placing immense pressure on the middle order and leaving a “thinner scoring base” around Amy Jones and Sophie Ecclestone.

3. Relentless Bowling Pressure

India’s bowlers operated as a pack, ensuring England batters never settled. While England took 17 wickets (aided by India’s declaration), India’s attack dismissed all 20 England batters.

The wicket column was shared, not dominated by a single bowler. Kranti Gaud was the standout performer, claiming seven wickets in the match (5/37 and 2/54), while Sneh Rana chipped in with six. Combined with key contributions from Satghare and Deepti Sharma, England faced a relentless “sequence of wicket-taking options” throughout the match.

Game Implications and Key Lessons

What This Means for India Women: This 270-run victory is a historic milestone. After the disappointment of the T20I series loss, India’s response was a “complete Test performance built around discipline.” The performances of young stars like Gaud, Bhatia, and Ghosh alongside veterans Mandhana and Rana prove that India’s long-format strength is deep and versatile.

What This Means for England Women: Despite the T20I series win, the Lord’s Test exposed vulnerabilities for England. The team must develop a “more reliable top-order method against movement, straight lines, and spin” on longer surfaces. Over-dependence on Jones, Sciver-Brunt, and Ecclestone must be addressed, and their lower order needs to translate crease occupancy into substantial runs.

Match Records and Attendance: The match was a landmark event, witnessed by a total of 37,846 spectators across four days. Viewership was widespread, broadcast by Sky Sports and BBC in the UK, and Sony Sports and DD Sports in India.

Individual milestones highlighted the historic occasion. Smriti Mandhana was named the leading aggregate run-scorer of the match with 153 runs (83 and 70). However, the defining individual innings belonged to Yastika Bhatia. Her 113 in the second innings (off 158 balls with 14 fours) was the first triple-digit score in a Women’s Test at Lord’s.

Kranti Gaud was deservedly named Player of the Match for her crucial seven-wicket haul that dismantled the English batting line-up.

Frequently Asked Questions

• Who won the England women vs India women Test match? India Women won the one-off Test at Lord’s by 270 runs.
• What was the final score? India Women finished with 285 all out in the first innings and 341/7 declared in the second, while England Women were dismissed for 170 and 186.
• Who was the Player of the Match? Kranti Gaud was named Player of the Match after taking 5/37 in England’s first innings and 2/54 in the second, claiming seven wickets in total.
• Who scored the most runs in the match? Smriti Mandhana was the leading aggregate run-scorer with 153 runs (83 and 70), while Yastika Bhatia recorded the highest individual innings with 113.
• What were Yastika Bhatia’s statistics? Bhatia scored 12 in India’s first innings and 113 off 158 balls in the second, featuring 14 fours to score the first triple-digit score in a Women’s Test at Lord’s.
• How many spectators attended, and where was the match broadcast? A total of 37,846 spectators attended across the four days, with UK coverage on Sky Sports and BBC, and Indian coverage through Sony Sports Network, DD Sports, and SonyLIV.

Conclusion

India’s 270-run victory at Lord’s was a testament to the power of collective execution. By building platforms through Bhatia and Mandhana, accelerating with Ghosh, and applying unrelenting pressure through Gaud and Rana, India secured a definitive and historic victory that will be remembered for generations.