milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats

Bucks vs Pacers Player Stats: Full Match Breakdown

Milwaukee Bucks vs Pacers: Complete Match Player Stats (March 15, 2026)

The Milwaukee Bucks walked into Fiserv Forum on March 15, 2026 and delivered one of their most complete offensive performances of the season. Final score: Bucks 134, Pacers 123. The milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats reveal a game where Giannis Antetokounmpo controlled the paint, Bobby Portis erupted off the bench with 29 points, and Milwaukee’s three-point shooting was nothing short of exceptional. The Pacers fought hard — but turnovers and a slow third quarter made the difference.

Quick Match Overview: Bucks vs Pacers at a Glance

DetailInfo
DateMarch 15, 2026
LocationFiserv Forum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Home TeamMilwaukee Bucks
Away TeamIndiana Pacers
Final ScoreMIL 134 – IND 123
Season2025–26 NBA Regular Season

Milwaukee went into this game on a challenging stretch of schedule and needed a home win badly. The Bucks got exactly that — a double-digit victory powered by elite shooting and dominant second and third quarters that put the game away before the Pacers could mount a real comeback.

Why Did the Bucks Win This Game Against the Pacers?

The milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats show three clear reasons Milwaukee won. First, the Bucks shot 52.3% from three-point range on 44 attempts — that number alone separates the two teams. Second, Milwaukee forced 19 Indiana turnovers and converted those into 27 points. Third, Giannis Antetokounmpo dominated the interior with 31 points and 14 rebounds, giving Milwaukee an anchor that Indiana simply couldn’t match.

The Pacers actually led 34–26 after the first quarter. But Milwaukee outscored them 40–31 in the third quarter and never looked back. Indiana’s bench contributed 55 points — more than Milwaukee’s 50 — but the Pacers’ 19 turnovers proved too damaging to survive.

Full Team Stats — Milwaukee Bucks vs Indiana Pacers

CategoryMIL BucksIND Pacers
Final Score134123
Field Goals Made / Attempted49 / 9042 / 81
Field Goal %54.4%51.9%
Three-Pointers Made / Attempted23 / 4421 / 42
Three-Point %52.3%50.0%
Two-Pointers Made / Attempted26 / 4621 / 39
Two-Point %56.5%53.8%
Free Throws Made / Attempted13 / 1918 / 23
Free Throw %68.4%78.3%
Total Rebounds4348
Offensive Rebounds1310
Defensive Rebounds2730
Assists3134
Steals105
Blocks26
Turnovers919
Personal Fouls1715
Points in Paint3830
Fast Break Points1510
Second Chance Points1615
Points Off Turnovers2713
Bench Points5055
Effective FG %67.2%64.8%
True Shooting %68.1%67.5%
Biggest Lead+19+10
Assists-to-Turnover Ratio3.441.89
Offensive Rating142.0122.9
Defensive Rating122.9142.0

Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown

TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Total
MIL Bucks26364032134
IND Pacers34313127123

Indiana looked sharp early, outscoring Milwaukee by eight in the opening quarter. But the Bucks flipped the script completely in the second quarter and then dominated the third quarter 40–31 — a 15-point swing that decided the game. The Pacers actually outscored Milwaukee in the first quarter but never led again after halftime.

Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats — Full Individual Breakdown

Giannis Antetokounmpo — 31 Points, 14 Rebounds, 8 Assists

Giannis was the engine of everything Milwaukee did in this game. He scored 31 points on 11-of-22 shooting, pulled down 6 offensive and 8 defensive rebounds for a 14-rebound total, and added 8 assists. He drew 10 fouls — the most of any player in this game — converting 9 of 13 free throws.

His 18 points in the paint told the real story. Giannis attacked the basket relentlessly throughout the game and made Indiana’s interior defenders pay every time. His plus/minus of +17 was the highest on either team, meaning Milwaukee outscored Indiana by 17 points during his minutes on the court.

StatGiannis
Points31
Rebounds14 (6 off, 8 def)
Assists8
FG Made / Attempted11 / 22
FG %50.0%
Free Throws9 / 13
Steals0
Blocks0
Turnovers1
Points in Paint18
Plus / Minus+17
Fast Break Points10
Efficiency Score42

Bobby Portis — 29 Points, 10 Rebounds (Bench Star)

Bobby Portis delivered the most impactful bench performance of the night. Coming off the bench, he scored 29 points on 11-of-21 shooting, including 6 three-pointers on 11 attempts. He grabbed 10 total rebounds — 4 offensive and 6 defensive — making it a legitimate double-double off the bench.

Portis was the spark that pushed Milwaukee’s advantage from comfortable to dominant in the second and third quarters. His 54.5% from three-point range on high volume is a number that any starter would be proud of.

StatPortis
Points29
Rebounds10 (4 off, 6 def)
Assists3
FG Made / Attempted11 / 21
Three-Pointers6 / 11 (54.5%)
Free Throws1 / 2
Steals2
Turnovers1
Points in Paint4
Effective FG %66.7%
Plus / Minus-4

Ryan Rollins — 20 Points, 7 Assists, 3 Steals

Rollins was Milwaukee’s most efficient starter on the night. He shot 8-of-12 from the field for 20 points, dished out 7 assists, and recorded 3 steals — giving Milwaukee a genuinely complete two-way performance from the guard spot. His 66.7% field goal percentage was the highest among all starters for the Bucks.

StatRollins
Points20
Assists7
Steals3
FG Made / Attempted8 / 12
FG %66.7%
Three-Pointers3 / 5 (60.0%)
Turnovers3
Rebounds2
Plus / Minus+14

Myles Turner — 13 Points, 4 Rebounds

Turner added 13 points on efficient shooting — going 4-of-7 overall and 3-of-6 from three. He contributed 1 steal and 1 block while making both his free throw attempts. His effective field goal percentage of 78.6% made him one of the most efficient scorers on Milwaukee’s roster in this game.

StatTurner
Points13
Rebounds4
FG %57.1%
Three-Pointers3 / 6 (50.0%)
Blocks1
Steals1
Effective FG %78.6%

Taurean Prince — 13 Points, 2 Assists, 1 Steal

Prince connected on 5-of-7 shots including 3-of-5 from three-point range, finishing with 13 points. His 71.4% field goal percentage and 92.9% effective field goal percentage were both standout numbers. He added 2 assists and a steal in a clean, efficient performance.

StatPrince
Points13
FG Made / Attempted5 / 7
Three-Pointers3 / 5 (60.0%)
Assists2
Steals1
Effective FG %92.9%
Plus / Minus+13

AJ Green — 12 Points (4-of-7 from Three)

Green shot exclusively from three-point range, making 4-of-7 attempts for 12 points. His 57.1% three-point percentage was part of Milwaukee’s collective barrage from distance that completely overwhelmed Indiana’s perimeter defense.

StatAJ Green
Points12
Three-Pointers4 / 7 (57.1%)
Rebounds2
Assists1
Plus / Minus+8

Kyle Kuzma — 8 Points, 8 Assists, 2 Steals

Kuzma quietly delivered a strong playmaking game. His 8 assists matched Giannis and represented the equal-highest assist total for Milwaukee. He added 2 steals and 1 block while managing the offense with composure when Giannis needed rest.

StatKuzma
Points8
Assists8
Steals2
Blocks1
Rebounds3
Three-Pointers2 / 6 (33.3%)

Indiana Pacers Player Stats — Full Individual Breakdown

Jarace Walker — 14 Points, 8 Rebounds, 6 Assists

Walker was Indiana’s most complete performer on the night. He scored 14 points on 6-of-12 shooting, grabbed 8 rebounds — 3 offensive — and added 6 assists. Despite a minus-17 plus/minus, his overall numbers represented a genuine effort against a Milwaukee team that was simply shooting at a historic level.

StatWalker
Points14
Rebounds8 (3 off, 5 def)
Assists6
FG Made / Attempted6 / 12
Three-Pointers2 / 6 (33.3%)
Points in Paint6
Plus / Minus-17

Jay Huff — 16 Points (Top Pacers Scorer)

Huff led Indiana in scoring with 16 points on 5-of-8 shooting, making 3-of-6 from three and going 3-of-3 from the free throw line. His 85.8% true shooting percentage was the best on either roster in this game. He added 2 blocks but struggled with a minus-15 plus/minus — the worst on the Pacers’ team.

StatHuff
Points16
FG Made / Attempted5 / 8
Three-Pointers3 / 6 (50.0%)
Free Throws3 / 3
Blocks2
True Shooting %85.8%
Plus / Minus-15

Obi Toppin — 11 Points, 4 Rebounds, 3 Assists

Toppin contributed 11 points from three-point range, making 3-of-7 attempts from deep. He added 4 rebounds and 3 assists, showing the versatility that makes him useful as a floor spacer. His 6 second-chance points showed good offensive rebounding instinct.

StatToppin
Points11
Rebounds4
Assists3
Three-Pointers3 / 7 (42.9%)
Second Chance Points6
Plus / Minus+2

Ivica Zubac — 10 Points, 7 Rebounds, 2 Assists

Zubac provided solid interior work with 10 points on 4-of-10 shooting and 7 rebounds — 3 offensive. He drew fouls consistently and converted 2-of-2 from the line. His overall efficiency suffered partly because Milwaukee’s defense made interior scoring difficult, limiting him to 40% from the field.

StatZubac
Points10
Rebounds7 (3 off, 4 def)
Assists2
FG %40.0%
Free Throws2 / 2
Turnovers1

Kobe Brown — 9 Points, 6 Rebounds, 5 Assists

Brown was one of Indiana’s most efficient players despite the loss. He shot 75% from the field, made 2-of-3 threes, and posted a 92.2% true shooting percentage. His 5 assists and 6 rebounds showed good playmaking and rebounding instincts, though his minus-11 plus/minus reflected the overall team struggle.

StatBrown
Points9
Rebounds6 (3 off, 3 def)
Assists5
FG %75.0%
True Shooting %92.2%
Plus / Minus-11

Taelon Peter — 9 Points (Off the Bench)

Peter was Indiana’s most efficient bench scorer. He shot 75% from the field and 66.7% from three, scoring 9 points in limited minutes. All 4 of his fast break points converted, making him a genuine threat in transition.

StatPeter
Points9
FG %75.0%
Three-Pointers1 / 2 (50.0%)
Fast Break Points4
Free Throws2 / 3

Head-to-Head Team Comparison: Bucks vs Pacers

Key MetricMIL BucksIND PacersWinner
Points134123Bucks
FG %54.4%51.9%Bucks
3PT %52.3%50.0%Bucks
Rebounds4348Pacers
Assists3134Pacers
Steals105Bucks
Blocks26Pacers
Turnovers919Bucks
Points Off Turnovers2713Bucks
Points in Paint3830Bucks
Fast Break Points1510Bucks
Bench Points5055Pacers
Biggest Lead+19+10Bucks
Offensive Rating142.0122.9Bucks

Milwaukee won 9 of these 14 categories. Indiana actually won the rebounding battle, the assists count, the blocks count, and the bench points total — and still lost by 11. The difference was turnovers. Indiana’s 19 turnovers cost them 14 extra points compared to what Milwaukee gave away on their 9 turnovers.

Milwaukee’s Three-Point Shooting: The Game-Changing Factor

The pacers vs milwaukee bucks match player stats make one fact impossible to ignore — Milwaukee’s three-point performance was extraordinary. The Bucks made 23 three-pointers on 44 attempts at 52.3%. For reference, the NBA average for three-point percentage across the 2025–26 season sits around 36%. Milwaukee shot 16 percentage points above that average in this single game.

Here is the Milwaukee three-point shooting breakdown by player:

  • Bobby Portis: 6-of-11 (54.5%)
  • AJ Green: 4-of-7 (57.1%)
  • Ryan Rollins: 3-of-5 (60.0%)
  • Taurean Prince: 3-of-5 (60.0%)
  • Myles Turner: 3-of-6 (50.0%)
  • Kyle Kuzma: 2-of-6 (33.3%)

Five of Milwaukee’s six primary shooters hit above 50% from three. Indiana’s defense had no answer for that kind of shooting volume and accuracy combined.

Indiana’s Turnover Problem: Where the Game Was Lost

The milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats tell a painful story for Indiana on the turnover front. The Pacers committed 19 turnovers — more than double Milwaukee’s 9. Those turnovers directly generated 27 Milwaukee points, compared to just 13 points Indiana scored off Milwaukee’s turnovers.

That 14-point differential from turnovers alone nearly equals Indiana’s final margin of defeat. The Pacers’ assist-to-turnover ratio of 1.89 paled next to Milwaukee’s 3.44. Several Indiana players struggled to protect the ball:

  • Jalen Slawson: 2 turnovers in limited minutes
  • Kobe Brown: 2 turnovers
  • Quenton Jackson: 3 turnovers in limited play
  • Obi Toppin: 2 turnovers
  • Jarace Walker: 0 turnovers (the cleanest game on Indiana’s roster)

The Pacers actually moved the ball well — their 34 assists were 3 more than Milwaukee’s 31. But every time a turnover came, Milwaukee’s transition offense converted efficiently.

Giannis Antetokounmpo vs Indiana’s Defense: No Answer Found

The pacers vs milwaukee bucks match player stats confirm what happened every time Giannis received the ball in the post or in transition — Indiana simply had no reliable answer. His 31 points came almost entirely through physical dominance. All 11 of his field goals were two-point attempts. He did not attempt a single three-pointer.

His 10 fouls drawn tells the real story. Indiana kept fouling him trying to prevent easier baskets, sending him to the line 13 times. He converted 9-of-13 from the free throw line — not his strongest percentage, but enough. His 14 rebounds gave Milwaukee extra possessions, and his 8 assists proved he was finding teammates when doubles came.

Giannis finished with a game-high efficiency score of 42, putting him comfortably above every other player in this matchup. His offensive rating of 141.3 during his minutes on the court shows how efficiently Milwaukee scored whenever he was active.

Bench Performance: Both Teams Delivered, Milwaukee Won

One of the most interesting parts of the milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats is how both benches showed up. Indiana’s bench actually outscored Milwaukee’s bench 55 to 50. That number means the Pacers got strong production from their reserves and still lost by 11.

Milwaukee Bench Contributors:

  • Bobby Portis: 29 points, 10 rebounds — the standout bench performance of the game
  • Ryan Rollins: 20 points, 7 assists — efficient across the board
  • Jericho Sims: 2 points, 3 rebounds in backup center minutes
  • Kyle Kuzma: 8 points, 8 assists — the floor general off the bench

Indiana Bench Contributors:

  • Jay Huff: 16 points — team-high scorer on the night
  • Taelon Peter: 9 points — most efficient Indiana bench player
  • Obi Toppin: 11 points — hit three threes
  • Quenton Jackson: 5 points, 2 assists
  • Micah Potter: 3 points in brief minutes

The difference was Bobby Portis. His 29-point, 10-rebound double-double off the bench was the single most impactful individual performance the reserves provided on either team. No Indiana bench player came close to matching that.

What These Stats Mean for Both Teams Going Forward

For Milwaukee: This win confirmed that the Bucks can still put together elite shooting performances when everyone contributes from three. The combination of Giannis dominating inside and multiple shooters connecting from distance is the version of Milwaukee that is genuinely difficult to stop. The 52.3% three-point clip will not happen every night, but the framework works when everyone finds their rhythm.

For Indiana: The 19 turnovers are the obvious concern. The Pacers actually played competitive basketball statistically — 51.9% shooting, 34 assists, 55 bench points. Their biggest problem was self-inflicted. Cutting turnovers in half would give Indiana a much better chance in this type of game. The Pacers outrebounded Milwaukee and generated more assists, which shows the core of their game is functional. Ball security is the clear area to fix.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Milwaukee Bucks vs Pacers game on March 15, 2026?

Milwaukee won 134–123. The Bucks trailed after the first quarter 34–26 but took control in the second quarter and dominated the third quarter 40–31 to build a lead Indiana could never close. The final margin of 11 points reflects Milwaukee’s stronger shooting efficiency and turnover conversion.

How did Giannis Antetokounmpo perform against the Pacers in this game?

Giannis recorded 31 points, 14 rebounds, and 8 assists with a plus/minus of +17. He shot 11-of-22 from the field, drew 10 fouls, and scored 18 points in the paint. His efficiency score of 42 was the highest of any player in the game by a significant margin.

Which player led the Indiana Pacers in scoring against Milwaukee?

Jay Huff led Indiana in scoring with 16 points on 5-of-8 shooting, including 3-of-6 from three and 3-of-3 from the free throw line. His 85.8% true shooting percentage was the best number posted by any individual player in the entire game, though his minus-15 plus/minus reflected Indiana’s overall team difficulties.

How many three-pointers did the Milwaukee Bucks make against the Pacers?

Milwaukee made 23 three-pointers on 44 attempts for a 52.3% three-point percentage. That is significantly above the NBA average of around 36%. Bobby Portis led the team with 6 three-pointers, followed by AJ Green with 4. Five different Bucks players made at least three threes in the game.

How did the Indiana Pacers’ turnovers affect the outcome of this game?

Indiana committed 19 turnovers compared to Milwaukee’s 9. The Bucks scored 27 points off those Pacers turnovers while Indiana only converted 13 points off Milwaukee’s mistakes. That 14-point difference from turnovers alone nearly accounts for the entire final margin. If Indiana had matched Milwaukee’s turnover total, the game would have been decided by much smaller margins.

Who was the best bench performer in the Bucks vs Pacers game?

Bobby Portis was the standout bench player of the game for either team. He scored 29 points on 11-of-21 shooting with 6 three-pointers, grabbed 10 rebounds, and recorded a double-double off the bench. Indiana’s Jay Huff led all bench players in scoring efficiency at 85.8% true shooting, but Portis’s volume and total impact was significantly greater.

The Full Picture: Milwaukee’s Night, Indiana’s Lesson

The milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats from March 15, 2026 document a Bucks team that fired on almost every cylinder. Their three-point shooting was historic for a single game. Giannis dominated inside. Portis delivered a bench performance that would start for many NBA rosters. And Milwaukee’s defense generated 10 steals and converted Indiana’s turnovers into 27 points.

Indiana played well enough to compete in most statistical categories. Their bench outscored Milwaukee’s. They out-assisted and out-rebounded the Bucks. But 19 turnovers in a single game against a Milwaukee team this efficient will produce a double-digit loss almost every time.

This game showed exactly what both teams are — Milwaukee is a dangerous, multi-dimensional offensive team when their shooting finds a groove. Indiana is a competitive, well-organized group that needs to protect the ball to have any chance against elite opponents.

If you want to track how both teams performed across the full 2025–26 season, or compare these numbers to the earlier matchup between the two teams, check the full season logs at the sources listed below.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *